Best Webcams for Cpu
Sort By
Top Products
- 1 RECOMMENDED by 6 people for CPU
-
Positives: Easy To Use, Excellent Performance, Good Picture Quality, Personal Web Camera
-
from
CamScott from Olive Branch, MS,
www.circuitcity.com
this camera requires heavy usb bandwidth and can be heavy on the cpu depending on the features you use.you can get premium results from thiscamera if you are willing to tinker a bit and find the
-
from
www.mwave.com
but it requires powerful cpu.
-
from
navvara,
www.newegg.com
when i run the camera on my laptop it maxes out the poor old cpu (pentium m 1.6).
-
from
www.amazon.com
good webcam, but require powerful cpu.
-
from
www.amazon.com
the avatars are very cpu intensive and don't really match your mouth and facial expressions well at all.
-
from
CamScott from Olive Branch, MS,
www.circuitcity.com
- 2 RECOMMENDED by 3 people for CPU
-
Positives: Easy To Use, Good Performance, Nice Picture Quality, Personal Web Camera
-
from
www.amazon.com
it eats up the cpu, so you have to go "control panel -> sound" and disable it.
-
from
www.amazon.com
nothing to compare to, but everything has been top notch so far: install, mike, auto-focus and cpu demands (very manageable on 3ghz/512mb ram laptop) for video chat;
-
from
www.amazon.com
i don't see any major cpu usage on a single core 2 ghz pentium m (old) laptop.
-
from
www.amazon.com
a simple 320x240 capture/preview (not even writing the video to disk) sucks down 10% more cpu on a p4 2.4 ghz machine with windows xp pro, than the old 4000 series cameras did.
-
from
www.amazon.com
- 3 RECOMMENDED by 2 people for CPU
-
Positives: Easy To Use, Nice Picture Quality, Excellent Performance, Personal Web Camera
-
from
www.amazon.com
it is compaq presario with intel pentium 4 cpu, 3 ghz with 2 gb of ram.
-
from
www.amazon.com
setup: windows xp professional sp 3 on a dell latitude d630 laptop with a 2.4 ghz core 2 duo cpu, nvidia video module, 2 gb ram.
-
from
www.amazon.com
- 4 RECOMMENDED by 2 people for CPU
-
Positives: Easy To Use, Good Performance, Good Picture Quality
-
from
www.mwave.com
it worked flawlessly on my xp desktop but would eat up a bit of cpu utilization.
-
from
www.amazon.com
worse, the additional pixels need a lot of cpu horsepower to process, and the 1.6 ghz dual core in my machine is simply not up to the task.
-
from
Pitt_Posum,
www.newegg.com
i only keep it for cpu, mobos and video cards.
-
from
N/A,
www.newegg.com
cons: takes a lot of computer cpu time, i've installed this on my older system nothing else can really run while the camera is on.
-
from
oldzoom,
www.newegg.com
cons: none other thoughts: i would recomend this to someone and buy it again.you need usb 2.0 and a 2.4ghz or faster cpu to get the best pic quality from the video, all around just a great
-
from
www.mwave.com
- 5 RECOMMENDED by 2 people for CPU
-
Positives: Great Performance, Easy To Use, Excellent Picture Quality
-
from
www.datavis.com
the only down side is that it uses your computer's cpu and the cpu of the webcam to do so, so video would be slightly slower if you have a slow computerrightsound: again logitech's own software.
-
from
Noel V from Elgin, Illinois,
www.circuitcity.com
good only for laptops and desktop pcs which cpu box/chassis is on the same flat as the monitor.
-
from
www.amazon.com
even though i was mislead to believe it was cordless (and it is'nt) , this is never the less a great camera , it was super easy to install , works well with skype , has lots of downloadable (free)
-
from
www.datavis.com
