you definitely will be satisfied with the quality of the picture.
excellent quality, kinda bright led lights, but at least they can be turned off on the go (well sorta).
the image quality is top notch.those led lights really work.my brother has a livecam from microsoft & paid $50.00 mine is at least the same if not better & i paid $22.00.the features are very
however, i'm using it pretty much just for video and it's quality is amazing.
the speed, color, and picture quality are all quite excellent.
the phillips i purchased sends better image quality than the microsoft 6000 webcam, and my brother even commented on the better quality to me while speaking over webcam.
i have seen higher quality cams, but not for this price.
what i like most about this cam is that it's easy, straight forward and top quality.
every few years i buy what i think is a better camera and each time the quality has gotten better.
better yet, i think the picture quality is better than the built-in isight on all the macs today.
video/image quality is better than comparible webcams in this catagory.
and such are very good quality.
i was on the web cam in 2 min after opening the box.i was pretty impressed with the quality of the picture for the price of the unit.basicaly i plugged it in my computer and started up skype and it
however, since it is a usb cam and the transfer rate of usb is rather slow the picture quality isn't that high but its better than nothing.
we tested it and while they spent way more money on their webcam, mine at almost 1/2 the cost has a better image quality.
the web-cam is great, very good quality!
i'm not sure of the picture quality of the cheaper one i was considering, but this the image quality is spectacular.
that's a bit tedious when setting it up to get a balance between bandwidth, disk space, and image quality.
multiple simultaneous streams do not seem to affect performance.
quality of image better than the tv-ip-110w, which was a little surprising.
snappy .11b performance (compared to the d-link .11b cams i replaced).
video quality is great in well light areas.
the picture quality is nice, installed software and plugged it in and it was ready to go, it has a mic built into the cam and also comes with a headset mic, i haven't played around with it much but
the picture quality is quite good; if you're not initially satisfied, try playing with the settings a bit and it will look great.the clip is quite generous, and it can even latch onto the top of my
pros-small size-easily attaches to anything-built-in microphone on webcam-also comes with earpiece/receiver for more private conversations-comes with camera "effects" for fun-good quality image and
we have been disappointed because the image quality (definition and colors) is lower than in "hercules deluxe optical glass", which actually cost even less!
pros: it works its pretty good quality...not that of an $100 or so webcam there is no yellow tint yet that i have to see.
overall though, a quality product designed well.
* color picture quality is excellent compared to the black and white summer infant monitor product (which had terrible interference problem).
it is not going to be digital quality but it is very clear and we are able to watch our son crawl around his crip, stand up on the rails, throw his pacifier on the floor, etc.
one of the main reasons i made this purchase was the quality of design.
although the cameras have ir capability, my experience has been that they need sufficient light to be effective.
we use it on skype and the quality is superb and the the lights on the camera are really helpful for seeing her beautiful face in the dark.
share this review: review?2?for?classic silver webcam overall: 5 [ratingof] 5 quality: 5 [ratingof] 5 features: 5 [ratingof] 5 value: 5 [ratingof] 5
but it has excellent video quality for this price.
my only suggestion is to make sure you have plenty of light and the resolution will be high quality.
picture quality is very good.
the quality of the video is very grainy.
i bought this product to use with skype and i expected a lot from hp because they tend to make good quality products.
this camera has proven to be both stable and reliable, and i am very happy with its performance.
in addition the quality if the image is not that good, and i tried to reach tech support, but they never responded.
the next 3 all have a terrible, cheap lens that produces a blurry image, a fisheyed image, and an overall lower quality image.
pros: picture quality is not bad.
the major problem of this product is the audio quality.
Compare Webcams for Performance »
Wize.com wants to improve! Will you please help by taking a quick survey?
No Thanks