it also has the clearest picture, by far.
i used my laptop to configure them through an ethernet cable.
but the picture quality is very poor.
the developers focused so much on creating pretty icons (that are actually ugly), that they completely forgot about usability -- and worse, they forgot to document!!!
although, i think this is more my laptop than a software problem.
id recommend even the bottom of the line axis cameras as their picture quality is much better.
picture quality was pretty decent.
its picture quality is relatively good compared to other cameras in this segment.
pros: ethernet and 802.11b/g connectivity with wpa encryption (it really does support wpa, even though none of the product literature says so), perfectly acceptable picture quality, interchangeable
picture quality is fine and setup software a breeze.
picture quality is good for the money.
picture quality is good enough during daylight hours.
i have a cheap little logitech camera that has worlds better picture quality and software.
not good in low lux and picture quality is not the best but it accomplishes what i needed it for.
- the picture quality is pretty good.
picture quality is excellent compared to the linksys wvc54gc which is very dark.
picture quality is poor and doesn't work in low light.
picture quality is below average.
picture quality as expected.
Wize.com wants to improve! Will you please help by taking a quick survey?
No Thanks