Best Washing Machines for Water

Analyzing reviews from 29 Sites…

25 out of 28 products found

Sort By

Overall Apartments Ease Of Use Spin Cycle Vibration Water More ▼

Baby Clothes Blankets Bulky Items Cleaning Ability Cycle Length Energy Efficiency Extra Rinse Cycles Household Use Large Families Portability Water Efficiency

Wize has searched all the product sites to find the best and worst products. We have read 8,463 Washing Machine reviews from 29 sites.

Price (Go)

Brand: Select

Features: Select

Maytag NFW7200TW Front Load Washer

$676.00 Est. at Amazon

from By euphgirl, reviews.homedepot.com
i love the fact that's it's quiet, water efficient, and a good product.
from By BinLA, reviews.homedepot.com
i hate to admit it but i stood there and watched the machine wash the first load...it uses alot less water than my top loader.....alot less...additional savings.
from By CDecker, reviews.homedepot.com
the machine uses so much less water than the 30+ year old top loader it replaced (obviously), and we actually noticed lower water bills since we began using it.
from By squeeli, reviews.homedepot.com
it does take a little longer to wash a load of clothes because it uses less water, but is usually finished about the same time as the dryer.
from By Anonymous Reviewer, reviews.homedepot.com
cleaner than the old machine and uses a lot less water.i'd been considering a less expensive top-loader, but i'm really glad that i spent the extra money (about $100) to purchase this front loader.

Read more reviews

Positives: Cleans Well, Excellent Vibration Control, Quiet Operation, Volume Capacity: 3.5 cu/ ft

2 RECOMMENDED by 17 people for WATER

LG WM2016C Front Load Washer

$974.00 Est. at Amazon

from www.bestbuy.com
without any further problems.if you are looking to replace your old machine with a more energy efficient and water efficient machine, then consider this machine to be the one you are looking for.
from www.bestbuy.com
it uses less water.
from www.bestbuy.com
it does take longer than a top loader to wash, but it is more gentle on clothes, uses a lot less water, and does dry more thoroughly in the spin cycle, thus cutting down on the dryer time.
from reviews.sears.com
we are very happy with it's performance, capacity and all around energy/water savings not to mention the savings in laundry suppies.
from www.bestbuy.com
it uses less water and less detergent than conventional models, saving money and the environment.

Read more reviews

Positives: Cleans Well, Quiet Operation, Nice Spin Cycle, Volume Capacity: 3.5 cu/ ft

3 RECOMMENDED by 16 people for WATER

LG WM2455 XL Front Load Washer

$1,199.00 Est. at Amazon

from www.bestbuy.com
what's great about it:?large capacity, cleans great, overall it's quiet, way less water usage what's not so great:?a little noisy with the vibrations at the end of the cycle when the spin kicks in;
from www.bestbuy.com
the washing cycles take a little longer than my old top load washer; but it's very quite and it uses a lot less water.
from www.bestbuy.com
it cleans well, uses less water and is quieter than the top-loading kenmore.
from reviews.sears.com
the large capacity is nice too.it is extremely energy/water efficient according to the yellow energy guide.
from By TDale, reviews.homedepot.com
i cut half a day out of laundry day and i can't wait to see the energy and water savings.it's also nice to be able to run even a small load and have it in a few minutes instead of wasting 20 gallons

Read more reviews

Positives: Cleans Well, Great Vibration Control, Quiet Operation, Volume Capacity: 4 cu/ ft

4 RECOMMENDED by 6 people for WATER

Maytag MFW9700SQ Epic High-Efficiency Front Load

$1,218.00 Est. at Amazon

from By JohnC, reviews.homedepot.com
the epic uses far less water, less detergent, cleans the clothes noticeably better, washes significantly larger loads and spin drys better.
from www.shopping.com
no-brainer settings, conserves water and electricity. cons: the high efficiency detergents are hard to find in our rural area.
from reviews.sears.com
the money we save due to less water usage is also a great added benefit for purchasing the maytag front load washer.
from reviews.sears.com
unless you're able to put your dryer to right of the washing machine - which not the norm in most houses - i would not recommend itbut i do love how it is a green enviroment product - saving water,
from a0077, www.shopping.com
pros: everything..quiet,uses less water, energy,and detergent cons: none

Read more reviews

Positives: Quiet Operation, Cleans Well, Excellent Vibration Control, Volume Capacity: 3.8 cu/ ft

5 RECOMMENDED by 4 people for WATER

Maytag MHWZ600TE Front Load Washer

$769.00 Est. at Amazon

from By TEB51, reviews.homedepot.com
also, it uses considerably less water.
from By Furey, reviews.homedepot.com
i;m really glad for the water savings as well since the rate is going up soon.
from By FatCatSPK, reviews.homedepot.com
for a large reduction based on the specifications of the maytag epic z since the only other water large water usage is showers and toilets and i've made them as water efficient as i can for now.
from www.amazon.com
it uses less water than our previous top loader and i have used the "add on" feature with success.
from By FatCatSPK, reviews.homedepot.com
quarterly our water bills, for just two people with no kids (yet), were over $200 so we're hoping for a large reduction based on the specifications of the maytag epic z since the only other water

Read more reviews

Positives: Quiet Operation, Good Vibration Control, Nice Energy Efficiency, Volume Capacity: 3.7 cu/ ft

Whirlpool WTW6400SW Cabrio 4.5 Cu. Ft. Capacity Washer

$1,398.00 Est. at Amazon

from www.bestbuy.com
it uses less water, which is good,since i have a septic system.it is well worth the money.
from reviews.sears.com
it is so quiet and really does use a lot less water and electricity.
from www.bestbuy.com
in january and february we used about 1000 gallons less water each month than november and december and the only change in our household was the new washer.
from reviews.sears.com
using less water, less detergent (he) and spending less time in the laundry room...all good things.
from reviews.sears.com
i have two almost new garmets with odd tears in them and i suspect this washer as the culprit because the low water level leaves the churning process too abrasive.

Read more reviews

Positives: Good Energy Efficiency, Excellent Vibration Control, Quiet Operation, Volume Capacity: 4.5 cu/ ft

LG WM2233H Front Load Washer

$1,184.00 Est. at Amazon

from www.bestbuy.com
i like how it uses less water and energy.
from www.bestbuy.com
it uses less water, quiet, cleans good and is fun to use - even my husband likes to use it now.
from www.bestbuy.com
what's great about it:?less loads per week, very quiet, capacity is huge, ease of use, much less water what's not so great:?haven't found one yet!
from www.bestbuy.com
and since the clothes come out of the washer with less water still in them (courtesy of the high rpm spin cycle), they take less time to dry.the only two things that i think are cons about the washer
from www.bestbuy.com
i love the fact that we are using less water and this is important because our county is clamping down on water usage this year.the wash cycles seem to take a little longer but the clothes dry a bit

Read more reviews

Positives: Nice Vibration Control, Cleans Well, Easy To Use, Volume Capacity: 3.83 cu/ ft

LG WM0742HGAG Washer

Check Site at Amazon

from By Tiner, reviews.homedepot.com
i like that it uses less water and that i can program it to start washing in the middle of the night.
from By PJC426, reviews.homedepot.com
it's quieter and uses much less water.
from By BrokeHomeowner, reviews.homedepot.com
it uses less water and clothes smell a lot better, you just have to keep in mind to get the cleaning tabs and clean washer once a month.
from By KimD64, reviews.homedepot.com
i'm glad i read that it uses so much less water.
from By LizL, reviews.homedepot.com
it does use less water than the traditional top loading washer.

Read more reviews

Positives: Cleans Well, Good Vibration Control, Nice Spin Cycle, Volume Capacity: 4.2 cu/ ft

LG WM3431 Front Load All-in-One Washer

$1,700.00 Est. at Amazon

from "Jen", www.compactappliance.com
it also uses a lot less water and detergent.
from www.amazon.com
cleaner clothes while using less water.
from bep1972, www.shopping.com
pros: convenient, great interface, good design, low energy, low water, ventless, 115v power, all-in-one
from coolbeanslady, www.shopping.com
pros: uses less water, soap, saves energy/money on my electric.
from jkkehew, www.shopping.com
energy/water efficient.

Read more reviews

Positives: Nice Vibration Control, Easy To Install, Cleans Well, Volume Capacity: 2.44 cu/ ft

LG WM0642HW 7 Cycle Front Load Washer

$1,081.00 Est. at Amazon

from By workinggirl, reviews.homedepot.com
i had my doubts, since it uses less water than a traditional washing machine, but am quite impressed with the results.
from By DELTATROOPER, reviews.homedepot.com
it uses far less water and energy than my old washer.
from "Dawn", www.homeclick.com
it gets the clothes clean using less water, less detergent and is so quiet that i can't believe it's actually running some times.
from By KMac, reviews.homedepot.com
it's quiet, uses much less water, and washes my clothes effectively.
from www.bestbuy.com
huge capacity, quiet compared to top loaders, definitely uses less water then conventional machines, two and a half loads in the old machine now fit in this model.

Read more reviews

Positives: Has Adjustable Settings, Quiet Operation, Excellent Vibration Control, Volume Capacity: 3.83 cu/ ft

Whirlpool WFW9200S Front Load Washer

$1,179.00 Est. at Amazon

from www.bestbuy.com
also, with a well and septic tank, it is nice that it uses far less water and electricity.
from By JasonN, reviews.homedepot.com
less water, shock absorbers, etc.
from www.bestbuy.com
clothes also come out with less water on them, so drying time is reduced.
from www.bestbuy.com
the water savings are there--my water bill went down about $11/mo.
from www.bestbuy.com
i do like that they hold more clothes than my old ones and that the washer uses less water, however i dont see any superior cleaning advantage at all.

Read more reviews

Positives: Excellent Water Efficiency, Nice Spin Cycle, Quiet Operation, Volume Capacity: 3.8 cu/ ft,3.2 cu/ ft

Whirlpool WFW8300S 3.3 Cu. Ft. Capacity Duet

$947.00 Est. at Amazon

from www.bestbuy.com
drum!once the laundry is finished....this is when you will be wow'ed...not only is this machine easy-to-use, energy and water efficient and quiet, it cleans clothing like you would not believe!
from "Deb the washer queen", www.abt.com
great product, uses much less water, and saves energy
from www.bestbuy.com
this washer has the energy saving and water saving per a wash, it use extremely very little water per wash.
from www.bestbuy.com
less water, lower drying time, less detergent.
from www.bestbuy.com
i notice less water being used and drying time is cut way down, which saves money in the long run.

Read more reviews

Positives: Excellent Energy Efficiency, Large Capacity, Short Cycle Time, Volume Capacity: 3.4 cu/ ft

GE WSSH300G Front Load Washer

$636.00 Est. at Amazon

from By mastermechanic60, reviews.homedepot.com
it uses less water, washes more clothes and cleans them better.
from By Frustrated1, reviews.homedepot.com
it uses less water and energy.
from By mrmac, reviews.homedepot.com
this washer cleans our clothes much better with less water.
from By KD147, reviews.homedepot.com
i knew front loader use less water but i really expected to see the clothes sloshing around in sudsy water.
from sasssyme, www.shopping.com
pros: right price, saves water cons: no customer support, get less than what you pay for the bottom line: do not buy this product because ge doesn't stand behind it.

Read more reviews

Positives: Cleans Well, Quiet Operation, Nice Water Efficiency, Volume Capacity: 3.5 cu/ ft

Maytag MTW6600TQ Washer

$1,245.00 Est. at Amazon

from By OnCeAjRzGrL, reviews.homedepot.com
it is very efficient, very quiet and uses less water than others that we have used.
from elisabethrn, www.shopping.com
pros: energy efficient, saves water, large capacity.
from flamino, www.shopping.com
pros: the maytag bravo washes big loads and saves water.
from new2me_opinion, www.shopping.com
pros: quiet, large loads, easy controls, water saving, high spin speed
from carwing17, www.shopping.com
pros: washing and drying cycles are fast and effective, using less water/energy!

Read more reviews

Positives: Easy To Use, Nice Vibration Control, Excellent Energy Efficiency, Volume Capacity: 4.5 cu/ ft

Miele W4840 Front Load Washer

$621.00 Est. at Amazon

from www.amazon.com
i wanted a front-loading washer because they are gentler on clothes and use less water.
from ritafp, www.shopping.com
pros: multiple cycle choices, cleans very well with little water, spins nearly dry.
from jlundquist1, www.shopping.com
pros: uses less water, electricity, & detergent.
from uzi94yu, www.shopping.com
pros: pros: super clean clothes, low water usage, quiet operation, great water removal.
from dalehoward, www.shopping.com
pros: cleaner/dryer clothes out, shorter dryer time, less water usage

Read more reviews

Positives: Nice Energy Efficiency, Quiet Operation, Excellent Vibration Control, Volume Capacity: 4 cu/ ft,3.5 cu/ ft

Whirlpool WFW9400S Front Load Washer

$1,239.00 Est. at Amazon

from mommyamy, www.shopping.com
less loads, less detergent, less water, and more washing options
from nannersmell, www.shopping.com
my clothes are cleaner, i am using less water and electricity.
from reviews.sears.com
so much for saving water.
from g2008randpa, www.shopping.com
pros: water saver and energy saver cons: poor service from whirlpool and their national service provider
from wlswarts, www.shopping.com
pros: energy and water efficiency!

Read more reviews

Positives: Nice Vibration Control, Easy To Use, Has Adjustable Settings, Volume Capacity: 3.8 cu/ ft

Frigidaire GLEH1642DS Front Load Stacked Washer

$1,085.00 Est. at Amazon

from reviews.sears.com
i love it for less water it uses and for its windowed washer door.
from reviews.sears.com
it does use much less water and the clothes seem to come out much cleaner.
from reviews.sears.com
love the compax style and water saving front end washer.
from reviews.sears.com
i also use less water than i did with my 2004 washer.
from www.shopping.com
pros: uses little water and detergent.

Read more reviews

Positives: Cleans Well, Quiet Operation, Great Energy Efficiency, Volume Capacity: 3.1 cu/ ft

Samsung WF328AA Washer

$994.00 Est. at Amazon

from gboughamer, www.shopping.com
newbies to front loaders might not grasp the concept of less water during washing to concentrate what little detergent is added.
from daw012, www.shopping.com
pros: less waterdryer uses less electicity because washer spins cloths really well

Read more reviews

Positives: Great Energy Efficiency, Quiet Operation, Good Vibration Control, Volume Capacity: 4 cu/ ft

Samsung WF328AAW Washer

$990.00 Est. at Amazon

from gboughamer, www.shopping.com
newbies to front loaders might not grasp the concept of less water during washing to concentrate what little detergent is added.
from flipnotica, www.shopping.com
i always wanted a front loader because they are very well known for their energy and water efficiency.
from daw012, www.shopping.com
pros: less waterdryer uses less electicity because washer spins cloths really well cons: i have no cons review: i have had the washer and dryer for a few months and i love them.they use less

Read more reviews

Positives: Cleans Well, Numerous Extra Rinse Cycles, Great Spin Cycle, Volume Capacity: 4 cu/ ft

Whirlpool WFW8400T Duet Sport HT Front Load Washer

Check Site at Amazon

from globalmail, www.shopping.com
pros: uses little water and detergent on normal cycles.
from kaycbbear, www.shopping.com
pros: this unit cleans the cloths well and uses little water.??
from sfbruce, www.shopping.com
pros: whiter whites, less water usage, shorter drying times
from alliehc, www.shopping.com
pros: quiet, cleans wonderfully, energy and water efficient

Read more reviews

Positives: Great Energy Efficiency, Nice Water Efficiency, Has Adjustable Settings, Volume Capacity: 3.7 cu/ ft

1 2 Next

Also Try:

More ▼

Home and Garden

Washing Machines

Best Washing Machines for Water

Maytag NFW7200TW Front Load Washer

LG WM2016C Front Load Washer

LG WM2455 XL Front Load Washer

Maytag MFW9700SQ Epic High-Efficiency Front Load

Maytag MHWZ600TE Front Load Washer

Whirlpool WTW6400SW Cabrio 4.5 Cu. Ft. Capacity Washer

LG WM2233H Front Load Washer

LG WM0742HGAG Washer

LG WM3431 Front Load All-in-One Washer

LG WM0642HW 7 Cycle Front Load Washer

Whirlpool WFW9200S Front Load Washer

Whirlpool WFW8300S 3.3 Cu. Ft. Capacity Duet

GE WSSH300G Front Load Washer

Maytag MTW6600TQ Washer

Miele W4840 Front Load Washer

Whirlpool WFW9400S Front Load Washer

Frigidaire GLEH1642DS Front Load Stacked Washer

Samsung WF328AA Washer

Samsung WF328AAW Washer

Whirlpool WFW8400T Duet Sport HT Front Load Washer

Ventless

Vibrations

Dispenser

Top Load

Weight

Top Brands

More Brands

Volume Capacity

Washer Type

Load Type

Control Features