Best Washing Machines for Top Loader, 3.2

Analyzing reviews from 29 Sites…

23 out of 23 products found

Sort By

Overall Apartments Ease Of Use Spin Cycle Top Loader, 3.2 Vibration More ▼

Baby Clothes Blankets Bulky Items Cleaning Ability Cycle Length Energy Efficiency Extra Rinse Cycles Household Use Large Families Portability Water Efficiency

For Top Loader, 3.2, people talk about

cleaning ability
water efficiency
vibration
noise level

Price (Go)

Brand: Select

Features: Select

LG WM2016C Front Load Washer

$899.00 Est. at Amazon

from www.bestbuy.com
what's not so great:?long washing cycle compared to top loaders "i am a sorority house director in a house with close to 40 girls living in it.
from www.bestbuy.com
what's great about it:?washes exceptionally well "i bought this machine one month ago and can't believe i waited so long to change from a top loader to a front loader.
from www.bestbuy.com
it does take longer than a top loader to wash, but it is more gentle on clothes, uses a lot less water, and does dry more thoroughly in the spin cycle, thus cutting down on the dryer time.
from www.bestbuy.com
it is very reasonably priced compared to other top loaders and offers all the features we could ask for.
from www.bestbuy.com
it is much better than my top loader washer.

Read more reviews

Positives: Cleans Well, Quiet Operation, Excellent Spin Cycle, Volume Capacity: 3.5 cu/ ft

2 RECOMMENDED by 9 people for TOP LOADER, 3.2

GE WSSH300G Front Load Washer

$663.00 Est. at Amazon

from By KathyInPa, reviews.homedepot.com
oh, did i mention that it uses very little water compared to top loaders and it's an energy saver product?
from By enviroman, reviews.homedepot.com
i have only used this machine once but it is so much better than my old top-loader.
from By Care, reviews.homedepot.com
this washer is saving me a lot of money on my water bill and since it works a lot faster then my old top loader it saves on energy too!
from www.ajmadison.com
the spin cycle is so efficient clothes dry in half the time it used to with our top loader.
from By junebug63, reviews.homedepot.com
i bought this machine to replace a 35 year old maytag top loader.

Read more reviews

Positives: Cleans Well, Quiet Operation, Great Water Efficiency, Volume Capacity: 3.5 cu/ ft

3 RECOMMENDED by 13 people for TOP LOADER, 3.2

Maytag NFW7200TW Front Load Washer

$665.00 Est. at Amazon

from By BinLA, reviews.homedepot.com
i hate to admit it but i stood there and watched the machine wash the first load...it uses alot less water than my top loader.....alot less...additional savings.
from By CDecker, reviews.homedepot.com
the machine uses so much less water than the 30+ year old top loader it replaced (obviously), and we actually noticed lower water bills since we began using it.
from By Anonymous Reviewer, reviews.homedepot.com
cleaner than the old machine and uses a lot less water.i'd been considering a less expensive top-loader, but i'm really glad that i spent the extra money (about $100) to purchase this front loader.
from By womencanfixthingsbetter, reviews.homedepot.com
it has lots of wash options, and it plays a little jingle when its done ;-) the washer does tend to move around a bit during the spin cycle and the cycles are definitely way longer than a top loader.
from By MrsHomeDepot, reviews.homedepot.com
and we found this front loader at a great price (our hydro/water company has a $100 rebate on top of the low price) so low it is the same price as most top loaders.

Read more reviews

Positives: Cleans Well, Good Vibration Control, Quiet Operation, Volume Capacity: 3.5 cu/ ft

4 RECOMMENDED by 19 people for TOP LOADER, 3.2

LG WM0642HW 7 Cycle Front Load Washer

$1,187.00 Est. at Amazon

from www.bestbuy.com
this machine is much quieter than my last washer, which was a top loader and i would recommend it to anyone.
from www.bestbuy.com
front loaders are a completely different beast compared to top loaders!on the positive side, i love the energy savings and the fact that my dryer time is cut to less than half of what it used to
from By Thehappywasher, reviews.homedepot.com
i was always a top loader person, but decided to go hi-tech and am glad i did.love it.
from www.bestbuy.com
huge capacity, quiet compared to top loaders, definitely uses less water then conventional machines, two and a half loads in the old machine now fit in this model.
from "Bogeybec", www.homeclick.com
the washer does cyle longer than my old top loader, on some cycles longer than it takes to dry the previous load.

Read more reviews

Positives: Has Adjustable Settings, Quiet Operation, Great Vibration Control, Volume Capacity: 3.83 cu/ ft

5 RECOMMENDED by 7 people for TOP LOADER, 3.2

LG WM2233H Front Load Washer

$1,184.00 Est. at Amazon

from www.bestbuy.com
my previous top loader was large too, but it seems i can fit quite a bit more into this washer.
from www.bestbuy.com
now, will it clean better than our old top loader?
from www.bestbuy.com
i don't know why it's worse for front-loader than top-loader, it just is.
from www.bestbuy.com
we can wash loads twice as big as we could in our top loader and use much less water and electricity!
from www.bestbuy.com
my clothes come out smelling fresher and brighter than my old top loader.

Read more reviews

Positives: Great Vibration Control, Cleans Well, Easy To Use, Volume Capacity: 3.83 cu/ ft

Whirlpool WTW6400SW Cabrio 4.5 Cu. Ft. Capacity Washer

$1,398.00 Est. at Amazon

from www.bestbuy.com
this top loader he machine saves additional money by not having to buy a pedatal as wiith other he front loading machines.
from www.bestbuy.com
this top loader was the next best thing!
from "Zaftigmumzer", www.abt.com
we compared front loaders to this particular top loader.
from www.bestbuy.com
most women preferred the front loader type, but i was interested in the top loader (personal preference).
from www.bestbuy.com
i researched the pros and cons of various brands and front and top loaders.

Read more reviews

Positives: Excellent Energy Efficiency, Good Vibration Control, Quiet Operation, Volume Capacity: 4.5 cu/ ft

Whirlpool WFW8300S 3.3 Cu. Ft. Capacity Duet

$951.00 Est. at Amazon

from reviews.sears.com
but it's clear that this is a superior product to the old top-loaders.
from reviews.sears.com
it does a great job washing, and you can wash a lot more clothes too than with the top loaders.
from reviews.sears.com
it does take longer than the top loader but the clothes come out clean and the spin is fabulous.
from www.bestbuy.com
it is very easy to use, cleans the cloths much better then my old top loader.
from www.bestbuy.com
if i remember correctly, it uses about one third of the water a top loader would need.

Read more reviews

Positives: Nice Energy Efficiency, Large Capacity, Short Cycle Time, Volume Capacity: 3.4 cu/ ft

Maytag MFW9700SQ Epic High-Efficiency Front Load

$1,218.00 Est. at Amazon

from By back2skewl, reviews.homedepot.com
it really washes cleans or clothes quicker than the regular top loaders, and the dryer is even faster then it.
from reviews.sears.com
it can hold a ton of clothes - i fit in what would have been 2-3 loads in my old top loader easily in one load.
from reviews.sears.com
bought this when my 15 year old top loader finally gave notice that it wanted to see other peoples' clothes.
from By JohnC, reviews.homedepot.com
i recently replaced an older kenmore dryer and a high capacity whirlpool top loader with the epic 9700 washer and dryer.

Read more reviews

Positives: Quiet Operation, Cleans Well, Excellent Vibration Control, Volume Capacity: 3.8 cu/ ft

LG WM2455 XL Front Load Washer

$1,199.00 Est. at Amazon

from www.bestbuy.com
water!) and other tidbits.we haven't had the washer very long, but it definitely gets the clothes clean, and what was taking several loads in a standard top-loader takes just one with this machine.
from www.bestbuy.com
this was my first time purchasing a front-loading washing machine, and i'll never go back to a top-loader again!!
from By Woodsie, reviews.homedepot.com
you will save water (some say a modest-sized pool's worth in a year), save time (capacity is at least twice that of my older, conventional top-loader with "extra large capacity"), save money on soap
from reviews.sears.com
compare with a top loader, you'll be surprised how low the yearly operating cost is.
from www.bestbuy.com
i had to use so much more detergent in our old top loader.

Read more reviews

Positives: Cleans Well, Great Vibration Control, Quiet Operation, Volume Capacity: 4 cu/ ft

LG WM0742HGAG Washer

Check Site at Amazon

from By waterfallsusan, reviews.homedepot.com
a bit of maintenance to get used to after using a top-loader that required almost no maintenance.
from By BusyMom10, reviews.homedepot.com
my not so old washer that i paid over $1,000 for (high efficiency, top loader) died, so i had to get another one.
from By Rocksister, reviews.homedepot.com
i went with lg to get away from belt-drive washers; that has always been my problem in the past with top loaders.

Read more reviews

Positives: Cleans Well, Excellent Vibration Control, Excellent Spin Cycle, Volume Capacity: 4.2 cu/ ft

LG Electronic WM2487HRM Front Load SteamWasher

$1,300.00 Est. at Amazon

from reviews.sears.com
i can fit more clothes in this machine then my last top loader and that comes in handy when washing more than one set of sheets!i would recommend this washer to anyone who is looking to get a new
from By NHGR8HND, reviews.homedepot.com
we found that using the spinsense button on the machine helped a lot and we would not go back to a top-loader.machine performance has been exceptional -- swear laundry hasn't been this clean.
from By motheroffour, reviews.homedepot.com
the wash cycles are a little longer than the top loaders but it gets the clothes much cleaner.
from www.bestbuy.com
it is quieter than any top loader i've had.
from www.bestbuy.com
the laundry is far cleaner and softer than it ever was with the old top loader.

Read more reviews

Positives: Excellent Vibration Control, Cleans Well, Quiet Operation, Volume Capacity: 4 cu/ ft

Whirlpool WFW9400S Front Load Washer

$1,299.00 Est. at Amazon

from reviews.sears.com
i replaced an old top loader machine and this machine is excellent.
from www.bestbuy.com
will never go back to top loader again.
from www.amazon.com
- uses half the water needed by top loaders
from www.bestbuy.com
i miss my old top-loader!
from reviews.sears.com
clothes soft, clean and drying time was almost half compared to my old top loader.

Read more reviews

Positives: Excellent Vibration Control, Easy To Use, Has Adjustable Settings, Volume Capacity: 3.8 cu/ ft

General Electric WCVH6800J Front Load Washer

$778.00 Est. at Amazon

from www.amazon.com
that is fantastic, given the fact that one load in this is like 2 and a half of a regular top loader.
from www.amazon.com
the cycle times seem to be longer than our previous top-loader, but that may just be because there is a timer on this model, so we're aware of how long a cycle is (we never actually timed our old

Read more reviews

Positives: Great Portability, High Quality, Good Water Efficiency, Volume Capacity: 4 cu/ ft

Bosch 11 Program Nexxt 300 Series Washer

$599.00 Est. at Amazon

from www.amazon.com
runs quieter and clothes are cleaner than my old top-loader.easy operation.the most i like:does not have lots of functions to choose from.saves water.buy it ,you will like it.
from www.amazon.com
but my husband's filthy clothes got amazingly clean, much cleaner than with the old top loader.

Read more reviews

Positives: Quiet Operation, High Quality, Volume Capacity: 3.81 cu/ ft, Washer

Maytag MHWZ600TE Front Load Washer

$760.00 Est. at Amazon

from By anniebtx, reviews.homedepot.com
i replaced a 10 year old maytag and i love the reduced noise of the front loader compared with the top loader.
from www.amazon.com
it uses less water than our previous top loader and i have used the "add on" feature with success.

Read more reviews

Positives: Quiet Operation, Excellent Vibration Control, Great Energy Efficiency, Volume Capacity: 3.7 cu/ ft

Fisher and Paykel Intuitive IWL16 Eco Washer

$805.00 Est. at Amazon

from "RevRev7", www.homeclick.com
my wife says she does notice the clothes are cleaner than with our traditional top loader maytag.

Read more reviews

Positives: Great Energy Efficiency, Quiet Operation, Has Adjustable Settings, Volume Capacity: 3.7 cu/ ft

Maytag MTW6600TQ Washer

$1,245.00 Est. at Amazon

from By bj78648, reviews.homedepot.com
i find myself looking for things to wash instead of trying to keep up with the laundry as i was doing with my other top loader.
from By ABCCBA789987, reviews.homedepot.com
we took a close look at the maytag bravos based on the recommendation of a good friend who bought the whirlpool cabrio...which is practically, if not actually, the same machine.we replaced a 13 year

Read more reviews

Positives: Easy To Use, Good Vibration Control, Excellent Energy Efficiency, Volume Capacity: 4.5 cu/ ft

WTW6200SW Whirlpool Cabrio Washer 3.8 Cu. Ft.

$931.00 Est. at Amazon

from gingerwinger, www.shopping.com
it outperforms the various front and top loaders i have used over the past 15 years.
from reviews.sears.com
the only sticking point at this time is that cr says that the heavy-duty wash option will use 58gallons of water instead of 45gallons most other top loaders use.
from reviews.sears.com
the 3.7 tub holds a nice full size load of clothing vs 3.2 tub.

Read more reviews

Positives: Large Capacity, Easy To Use, Short Cycle Time, Volume Capacity: 3.8 cu/ ft

GE Profile WPRE6100GWT Stainless Steel Basket

$539.00 Est. at Amazon

from By usdfr63, reviews.homedepot.com
at first, i honestly didn't think the machine was working.the speed of the spin cycle seems much faster than any other top loader i have owned and with the extended spin time option, the clothes come
from reviews.sears.com
couldn't fit a front loader, so had to go with an old fashioned-top loader.
from By Mykidisnuts, reviews.homedepot.com
there is nothing like a top loader that you can control!

Read more reviews

Positives: Good Vibration Control, Quiet Operation, Has Adjustable Settings, Volume Capacity: 3.5 cu/ ft

GE WJRE5500GWW King Size Capacity Washer

$448.00 Est. at Amazon

from reviews.sears.com
i reverted to a top loader because my front loader just did not seem to get my laundry as fresh and clean as i would like it.
from reviews.sears.com
i would recommend this top loader to anyone who still wants the reliable, cheap to maintain "sedan" of the washer world versus the sleek "sports cars" that require special stands, special detergent,
from reviews.sears.com
i am a healthy fit person but i do not understand why anyone in their right mind would want to bend down to lift heavy, wet loads of clothing from their washer if they could have a top loader instead.
from reviews.sears.com
checked the review's at sear's site and had to replace a 17 year old, 3.2 cu.
from reviews.sears.com
after working on the brand new washer for a couple of hours and disassembling the entire wahser, the repairman said it needed new bearings, rings, seal & shaft assembly; after seeing him tear that

Read more reviews

Positives: Large Capacity, Quiet Operation, Excellent Vibration Control, Volume Capacity: 3.5 cu/ ft

1 2 Next

Also Try

More ▼

Home and Garden

Washing Machines

Best Washing Machines for Top Loader, 3.2

LG WM2016C Front Load Washer

GE WSSH300G Front Load Washer

Maytag NFW7200TW Front Load Washer

LG WM0642HW 7 Cycle Front Load Washer

LG WM2233H Front Load Washer

Whirlpool WTW6400SW Cabrio 4.5 Cu. Ft. Capacity Washer

Whirlpool WFW8300S 3.3 Cu. Ft. Capacity Duet

Maytag MFW9700SQ Epic High-Efficiency Front Load

LG WM2455 XL Front Load Washer

LG WM0742HGAG Washer

LG Electronic WM2487HRM Front Load SteamWasher

Whirlpool WFW9400S Front Load Washer

General Electric WCVH6800J Front Load Washer

Bosch 11 Program Nexxt 300 Series Washer

Maytag MHWZ600TE Front Load Washer

Fisher and Paykel Intuitive IWL16 Eco Washer

Maytag MTW6600TQ Washer

WTW6200SW Whirlpool Cabrio Washer 3.8 Cu. Ft.

GE Profile WPRE6100GWT Stainless Steel Basket

GE WJRE5500GWW King Size Capacity Washer

Green

Quiet

Allergy

Top Loeading

Toploader

Top Brands

More Brands

Volume Capacity

Washer Type

Load Type

Control Features