Beta Request the Web's Best
Home and Garden > Washing Machines > Products > WHIR > Whirlpool WFW9400S Front Load Washer

Whirlpool WFW9400S Front Load Washer Review

Whirlpool WFW9400S Front Load Washer

Find Lowest Price »
$953 - $1,712
According to 56 reviews, the Whirlpool WFW9400S Front Load Washer is overall a very good product. People rate it most highly for Large Families, Bulky Items, Full Size, Front Loader and Spin. It is quite still. If you're shopping for a Washing Machine, we suggest you try the Whirlpool WFW9400S Front Load Washer.
 

People Recommend For

Features People Talk About


Product Ratings

Overall (56 Reviews) 4.5 Stars
  • Shopping.com (18 Reviews)
    3.0 Stars
  • Abt.com (11 Reviews)
    4.5 Stars
  • Amazon.com (9 Reviews)
    2.5 Stars

Specs & Features

Released

  • 1 year ago

Volume Capacity

  • 3.8 cu/ ft

Washer Type

  • Washer

Load Type

  • Front Load

Control Features

  • Electronic Touch
  • Dial Controls
  • End-of-Cycle Signal

Additional Features

  • Quiet Operation
  • Child Safe

Dispensers

  • Fabric Softener Dispencer
  • Bleach Dispenser
  • Detergent Dispenser
  • Pre-Wash Dispenser

Energy Efficiency

  • Energy Star Compliant

Exterior Color

  • White
  • Beige
  • Black

Extra Settings

  • Quick Wash
  • Heavy Duty
  • Extra Rinsing

MPN

  • WFW9400S

Overall Depth

  • 31.5 in.

Overall Height

  • 38 in.

Overall Width (Display)

  • 27 in.

Spin Speeds

  • max. 1200 rpm

Temperature Levels

  • 5 Levels

Tub Material

  • Stainless Steel

Warranty

  • 1 Year Limited

Wash Presets

  • Delicates, Hand Wash, Sanitary, Wool, Soaking
  • 14 Wash Presets, including: Delicates, Hand Wash, Sanitary, Wool, Soaking

Water Levels

  • Automatic
Hint: Click above to read more reviews

What People Say


fetching reviews ...
fetching offers ...

Haven't Found What You're Looking For?

?
Best Washing Machines for

More Ways People are Using Washing Machines

© Wize, Inc.

Wize.com wants to improve! Will you please help by taking a quick survey?

Yes! Take me there.

No Thanks