Beta Request the Web's Best
4 Best Telescopes for

Large

Advanced Filters
No 1 Celestron StarHopper 10 10110 600 x 254mm
Celestron StarHopper 10 (10110) (600 x 254mm) Telescope ratings

$25

Released 1 year ago

Find out more »

16 People Recommend
for this use
"Shoe Size: Felt half size larger than marked…"

- Shoebuy.com User

"Shoe Size: Felt full size larger than marked…"

- Shoebuy.com User

"It's a little larger than he really needs, but he doesn't…"

- Shoebuy.com User


No 2 Celestron NexStar 8 SE 8" 203mm
Celestron Celestron NexStar 8 SE 8" (203mm) Schmidt-Cassegrain Telescope Kit ratings

$1,399

Released 1 year ago

Find out more »

3 People Recommend
for this use
"I bought a larger level from an RV store and epoxied…"

- Amazon.com User

"The Bottom Line: The NexStar 8SE makes a larger telescope portable…"

- Pirich at Shopping.com

"The hand controller now has a larger database of objects that…"

- Amazon.com User


No 3 Orion StarBlast Astro 9814 267 x 114mm
Orion StarBlast Astro 9814 (267 x 114mm) Telescope ratings

$180

Released over 3 years ago

Find out more »

2 People Recommend
for this use
"I've had an Orion StarBlast for over a year now, and…"

- Amazon.com User

"You will still be happily using this scope long after you…"

- Amazon.com User

"With the larger magnification eyepiece, the moon's image more than fills…"

- Amazon.com User


No 4 Meade LightBridge 12 in. Deluxe 600 x 304.8mm
Meade LightBridge 12 in. Deluxe (600 x 304.8mm) Telescope ratings

$899

Released over 2 years ago

Find out more »

2 People Recommend
for this use
"Cons: Some balance issues with larger eyepieces at low altitude.…"

- neilvickers at Shopping.com


Related Lists

Some other Telescopes we thought you might like.

Get Advice, Give a Tip

Be the first to add a tip …


Can't find what you're looking for?

?
Best Telescopes for
For example: Best Telescopes for "Gift", "Easy", "Bat", "Price" or "Portability".
© Wize, Inc.

Wize.com wants to improve! Will you please help by taking a quick survey?

Yes! Take me there.

No Thanks