pros: we have over twenty of these in production, running 24x7 and haven't had any stability issues.
rock solid stable at a good price.
i've been crunching numbers for climateprediction.net for a little over a year now in addition to playing games and doing cad work.
pros: stable, very stable.
pros: very stable board.
super stable.
note though if you are considering dual quad core as an extreme gaming solution you are actually better off with a c2d qx6700 as it can clock much higher.
i'm running fc6 on it with a single 1.86ghz clovertown, and it has been very stable.
(letter “l” is critical to make it compatible with 771 socket) other thoughts: if workload is gpu intensive and does not have heavy use for cpu then high end game setup would be more practical.
intel raid and vista 64 were very easy to install raid 0 for os and games very fast cons: no sli (not a problem for me as single gtx280 enough), could use more usb headers, big problem was
very stable, can take dual or quad core xeons.
it's super fast and is rock solid stable.
rock solid stability, and performs great in terms raw cpu, graphics, and storage benchmarks.
fast and stable !
No brands available
Wize.com wants to improve! Will you please help by taking a quick survey?
No Thanks