its small size makes it easy to handle and the built in stabilization and zoom adds to its functionality.
were it not for that, i'd be comfortable overlooking the other minor imperfections and giving this a solid 5 stars.
the reason is the capability on this camera is second to none regarding over all picture quality.
and flash memory works similar to hard drive performance - the more free space you have, the faster and better they perform.
holding the camera, the canon is light weight and feels comfortable where as the samsung is a bit heavier and the placement of the zoom is a bit more difficult to work.
the jvc everio gz-hm200 is a very compact and feature rich hd camcorder that performs well in most shooting conditions.
it would be distracting to the audience when recording your child's band performance, etc.
again, keep in mind the price point - you need to shell out $700 or more to get a camcorder with decent indoor capability.
it even has a very powerful 20x zoom (vs the more usual 10x-12x on hi-def cams) and similar performance.
with dual slot sd card capability, you can store several hours of footage before having to upload.
what's great about it:?size, ease of use what's not so great:?limited features "this is a great little video camera.
what's great about it:?compact what's not so great:?does not zoom in "this camera performs well.
it's a lot thinner and smaller than the flip video ultra series camcorder, 60-minutes (white), yet yields equal performance.
the memory isn't expandable, and you've got 60 minutes of recording capability with this, so if you're a photojournalist on assignment in beirut, it's probably not gonna cut it for you.
obviously, it's not going to record in hi-def, but it performs well enough.
i really like the camcorder, it fits comfortably in my hands.
into one small package (it fits in a large pocket - very easy to tote around but not very impressive to an actor on the set!) the low light performance is something that some have complained about.
they're good for 1 hour 18 minutes at the highest resolution and that pretty well matches the included battery capability.
low light capability is decent (but improved a lot by using the video light for video recording or internal flash for taking photos).
this is more of a usability comparison with my optura 300 and powershot, but consider the following comments when considering other cameras, or using a camera with this capability:
you can't pause the recording, so you get separate clips, but for keeping up with family and events, it's great!
it fits easily into a purse or pocket and has very simple operating instructions.
the video quality isn't hd, but it's not bad for a device that fits comfortably in a pocket.
i haven't had time to mess with it, so i can't use it with my mac, but it is quick and easy on the pc (xp operating system)
canon have led the way with image quality (in video) for the last two years and it really shows here.at the end of the day it comes down to what you like, what you feel comfortable with and what you
the camera fit comfortably in the palm of your hand and made using it a joy.
it is very light and difficult to hold steady especially when using the telephoto lens.
great color and easy functionality.
the ability to pause a video in playback mode and push the camera button on top to take a snap shot is fantastic for getting a more natural looking picture.
the picture is clear with good color, it's easy to hold steady, and it captures good sound when it is close to the subject.
this model accommodates both mac and windows operating systems.
obviously, the 120 minutes of recording capability is huge, too.
nothing to load, rewind, fast forward.
9- video capability is also pretty good in low light levels.
users who expect $500+ camcorder performance will likely be disappointed.
minuses on this camcorder include but not limited to: no pause feature during recording (only stops current file, and starts a new one upon restart) and very jittery, highly recommend purchase of a
* i find the camera easy to hold, especially with the sleeve that it comes with.
one day, possibly very soon, they will have technology to cram all the functionality of a full size camcorder into a small, palm-sized unit such as this vado, but not today.
-- good performance in low light - although one wishes for some sort of extra light source in a really dark room, this camcorder performs above average in low light as does the mino hd
low light capability is so amazing and outstanding.
from the reviews i found all three were top contenders, the panasonic made me nervous using the three smaller chips (i am concerned about low light performance) but the purchase decision for me came
after using both i came to the same conclusion.i felt though that the sony was easier and more intuitive to use, more comfortable in my hand and the controls better placed.
i use the cameras for budget films.after spending a decent time comparing both, other than slightly edging out the hfs10 in low light color performance (the sony had better low light color, the canon
this camcorder is a bit bulkier than many other hd models out right now, but is comfortable to hold while shooting.
i wanted something small and easy to hold with a hard drive.
the video is beautiful, especially in low light, which was a concern since i read many reviews of other video cameras that indicated the low light performance was not very good.
overall, i would give this hg21 a "a-" for great daylight performance, working with imovie'08 which is a wonderful consumer movie making tool, but has lackluster grainy night scenes.
lots of features are available, the menu and buttons are very easy to understand and use.
however, the sony is the superior product imho based on the following features: much better low-light performance (by low-light i mean indoor night-time videos of kids with under ordinary
this isn't a review of the features and performance of the camera.
not super comfortable, but doable.
i did not notice any better low light performance in those modes either.
i have not tried editing functionality, but it seems to me that specialty video editing software would be better in any case.
i am very pleased with the overall quality and functionality of this camcorder.
the sd card format also means reviewing footage on a shoot is painless and won't require rewinding tape to try and get to a particular shot.
i am completely happy with this camera's performance.
especially liked the large comfortable color view eye piece.
i had the pleasure of operating it for a short time.
it's still capability is useable only for the web (1-megapixel).
i take it everywhere with me and am very pleased with its performance.other relatives and friends are now going to order one.thanks rca and amazon.
if you'd like good functionality and simplicity for a low price, this is a good choice.
now that it's functioning, it works great and is very portable.
only hd could improve it, and then only if you needed that degree of performance.
to close, a great little camera at a good price/performance point.
this camera is identical in performance to the gz-mg330, the only difference is that this model uses sd cards instead of a built in hard disk.
i wasn't expecting steady-cam level performance, but this is ridiculous.
Compare Camcorders for Functionality »
Wize.com wants to improve! Will you please help by taking a quick survey?
No Thanks