strengths: na weaknesses: na summary: using with high end or lower quality photos the photoshop cs2 product has been wonderfully enlightening and enjoyable to use.
using with high end or lower quality photos the photoshop cs2 product has been wonderfully enlightening and enjoyable to use.
summary: using with high end or lower quality photos the photoshop cs2 product has been wonderfully enlightening and enjoyable to use.
summary: i've used the program to edit both new digital photos and recently scanned images of very old film slides.
i've used the program to edit both new digital photos and recently scanned images of very old film slides.
what it does is offer a layout program with a very "mac-like" drag-and-drop interface that allows anyone to assemble photo stories from their collection of digital images.
on the surface the app is just a "fun" app with no practical purpose; it's great to make things like mementos for your kids' friends from a birthday party, or a fun vacation photo album.
i was developing comic type layouts of my photos within 1 hour of loading the software.
you just drag and drop your photos onto your page where you can instantly "comicify" or digitally alter your photos to look like comic drawings.
i have made photo pages for a scrap book, a comic birth announcement, and more.
this product, which unfortunately is pc only (not mac), has long been viewed as a very good substitute for photoshop because it is much less expensive than photoshop but is still powerful.
it's a shame paint shop pro (psp) is so often described as simply an alternative to photoshop.
i have tried the major photo manipulation software and found it awkward and a memory hog.
it is far less expensive than photoshop cs2 and does most of what photoshop can do.
the original teaser software before loading full program, then it required several updates to work out a few known bugs), i've found paint shop pro x with corel photo album both fun and easy to use.
the answer to this question will be different for each user and highly based on how you use photoshop and how many pictures you take.
strengths: highly-integrated photo-video work package.
practically every article explaining how to do something fancy will reference photoshop.
i was using a photoshop 7: photoshop cs2's new features seemed compelling, so i downloaded a 30-days trial version to test drive it.
that said, this version of photoshop is superb, an otherwise 5-star app.
aperture 1.5 is simply the best photo tool out there.
with no manual or instruction of any type, i was up and running with aperture within hours of installing it and importing my 50+ gig worth of raw photos.
this is truly a professional level digital photography post-processing package.
i've gone from someone who only rarely edited photos due to the hassle of making duplicate copies, firing up photoshop, wasting extra hard drive space, etc.
i am an amateur photographer who shoots a lot of raw files.
i have watched lots of movies, hundreds of podcasts, i have about 10k photos on it and about 11k songs.
it also had no problem recognizing my photo files and bringing them into the software as well.
the zune software watches whatever folders you tell it to; automatically importing new content (video, music, or photos) into your library whenever they are added to any of those folders.
again, all i care about is music although i may put photos on it and use the radio function.
i loaded all of my cd's and photos and am still less than 50% full.
i didn't like the weak photos in the old collection and this larger collection is not a great improvement.
with individual images from a photo library costing about as much as this whole collection, it's great value.
not so good for those looking for photo clip art, as photos are "high-res" at 200 dpi.
the images are great, the high res photos are high quality, the font collection is extensive.
the photos alone would be worth thousands if purchased from other companies and the variety of clip art is phenomenal.
it was so easy to install and i installed both cd's so now i don't have to get the cd to get other images off the cd.the photo story is great and i have used it a lot.
microsoft digital image suite 2006 is the best & the most easiest photo editing software to use unlike adobe photo shop.
you can take your ordinary photos and turn them into stunning professional quality prints.
easy use, all professional photographer have to buy it, althought the main things is to make photo when you shot.
it's almost pointless to review photoshop: if you need a high-end photo editor, there's really no competition to it.
pros: best photo editing software available cons: none "much improved raw & bridge convinced me to buy cs3.
i primarily use bridge (it is great for orgainzing my large digital photo collection.), photoshop and dreamweaver.
photoshop and acrobat are the big titles from adobe on this suite.
i'm a web developer, not a photoshop guru, but dang -- with this version of photoshop, i'm kinda wishing i was!
there are still a number of unwanted bits & pieces, fireworks being one, the adobe stock photos being the most annoying (how do you stop its incessant upgrades if you haven't installed it in the
i now used ps cs3 to edit photos and i am very proud of it.
additional thoughtsat work i have use photoshop since the first version came out, i learned the program using the tutorial and experimenting.
photoshop has been the leader in the field for many years now.
if you're looking at the full version of photoshop, i assume that you have not yet taken the plunge into the big leagues of editing programs.
this is the premier photo editing program, but the advancement comes at the price of some instability, pariculary in the companion bridge
the images were accessible thru the software provided with the product but also with other photo-handling, modification software.
i use it all the time for different photo applications.
this software is full of beautiful photographs that are perfect for nature blogs, cards, and many other purposes.
waste of $10. the bottom line: topics entertainment's natgeo photo gallery seems like a bargain but even at a bargain price, you really don't get much in the way of images.
there is no other product that lets me use so many different artistic tools/brushes with my photos, and i take a lot, or for painting my own from scratch.
i do this myself; i take photos or sketches and try out palettes to see how a certain color scheme works.
i can drag and drop a photo into the program easily.
when trying to insert photos into a document to create a professional looking brochure for publication i was very disappointed and was not able to use the software, which also kept closing down on me.
what is good about this program is a generous selection of templates, graphics and ease of using photos from iphoto or some other program.
this is much better than epson photo r220, i have been using it but causing problems with cd/dvd feed tray, every time i print it it kept missfeed or eject it had to do it several times before
it has a collage tool that allows several photos to be merged for a cool labeling effect.
i use it to label discs that contain family photos of various themes.
after a few years of struggling with various labeling software using avery products, i was amazed at how easy it was to create a beautiful dvd cover (using a photo from my files) for my wife's 50th
yeah, it's a four color system as opposed to a six color system that some photo printers use, but this is a cd/dvd printer, not a photo printer.
a bonus feature that nero did not allow, you can put in still photos into your video and determine how many seconds it plays.
yes, a clean .avi file that has none of your fades, wipes, pans, or linked files of all your videos and photos that is hogging up your memory and system.
the videos, text, photos on the screen.
i also own photo elements 5 (imho 5 stars), and strongly recommend users look at the new dual package.
since i am a photoshop fan, i decided to try adobe premiere elements 3.0 and was totally pleased.
it lets you manage your photos with albums and with a timeline extracted from your pics.
for "the rest of us" who don't really need all the power of photoshop, this is a great product.
the software installed like it was supposed to and i've already used it to play with some photos i have residing on my idisk.
editing their photos.
even though i use iphoto to fix most of my pictures, photoshop elements 4 offers so many other styles & filters you can apply to your photos.
you can do more photo editing and touchup.
i've been into digital photography, at the amateur level, for years now and finally found the program that magically seems to meet, even exceed, all what i ever wished to do with photos in terms of
this is perfect for the amateur/hobby-inclined photographer.
so, if i want to use a microsoft software package to edit my photo images then i will have to buy a new software package - isn't that wonderful.
now has a photo editing program which i like.
after upgrading to v22, i find the new photo editing feature to be helpful, especially if you don't have a photo editing software on your computer.
there are many more options, photo editing, graphics, etc.
i tried the photo editor, but since i have a simple photo editor that i already like, i don't see myself using this one too often.
on the front of the box it says it can be used for professional photo editing and has 20,000 professionally designed projects, when i received the box it had a disclaimer that the photos cannot be
Compare Design and Multimedia Software for Photography »
Wize.com wants to improve! Will you please help by taking a quick survey?
No Thanks