my web-design workflow in cs2 typically utilised illustrator cs2 -> photoshop cs2 -> golive cs2.
photoshop to flash is nice; i had tried this with older versions of both, and it didn't work so well then.
i primarily use bridge (it is great for orgainzing my large digital photo collection.), photoshop and dreamweaver.
photoshop is going to be a long study to get it working the way i want so one more book to buy!
they are excellent, but imo far too expensive - unfortunately if you need illustrator, photoshop, and flash - the creative suite is the way to go since it is at least less expensive than buying them
the adobe photoshop cs2 upgrade is a great product at the price of $150 or in my case $122.
summary: the adobe photoshop cs2 upgrade is a great product at the price of $150 or in my case $122.
i've had this version of photoshop now for a little over two weeks and am just beginning to really get into it.
photoshop does it again strengths: the best program in the business just got a little better.
i use photoshop to edit very large, mural-sized images that run up to about 2gb.
unlike any other photo editing softwares, adobe photoshop cs3 gives you the great ability and opportunity to edit and learn something new.
"adobe photoshop cs3 will look very attractive to almost any user."
"every year, photoshop gets better tools.
additional thoughtsat work i have use photoshop since the first version came out, i learned the program using the tutorial and experimenting.
the conversion to .jpeg & other file formats easily recognized by photoshop (my personal choice) & other editing programs will make it appear quite seamless.
it iterfaces with flash, the gimp, photoshop and illustrator (haven't tried it in paintshoppro, yet..).
i'm stuck having to now draw my manga in photoshop and import psd files into ms in order to be able to get anything accomplished.
the interface is easy to use and familiar to anyone familiar with adobe photoshop.
the interface is reminiscent of photoshop and so most of the functionality is inuitive.
this is the best version of photoshop yet and the plug ins available work with amazement.
i have used photoshop for about 6 years and still find more & more things i can do and continue to learn as i go.
however, if you are considering using photoshop for the first time, and you can get past the high price, and you have some time to invest in learning it, and a lot of time to invest using it...it's
it's almost pointless to review photoshop: if you need a high-end photo editor, there's really no competition to it.
having grown up with photoshop from 4.0, photoshop has certainly grown up with me!
using with high end or lower quality photos the photoshop cs2 product has been wonderfully enlightening and enjoyable to use.
summary: using with high end or lower quality photos the photoshop cs2 product has been wonderfully enlightening and enjoyable to use.
strengths: na weaknesses: na summary: using with high end or lower quality photos the photoshop cs2 product has been wonderfully enlightening and enjoyable to use.
photoshop has the greatest user support and educational community (national association of photoshop professionals) for any software product that has ever existed.
i don't have to be the one to say that adobe photoshop cs2 is the best photo editing program on the market, but it is.
summary: i've been using my adobe photoshop elements 4.0 for about a month, now.
i've been using my adobe photoshop elements 4.0 for about a month, now.
as a former photoshop user from back in the day (before cs), i was concerned i wouldn't have professional abilities with 4.0.
i am a photoshop user at work and wanted photoshop for home use.
the bottom line is that the oem digital editing software included with your digital camera may give as good or better editing control than photoshop elements (pse).
i self-taught myself photoshop and it worked pretty well for me.
i like the live paint tool also because it reminds me of working in photoshop.
integrates well with photoshop.
i'm use to photoshop being so fast compared to illustrator that i get impatient.
having taught myself everything from ms-dos to turbocad, to photoshop elements, not to mention word, excel, and powerpoint (don't get me started on that latter program, argh), i figured i could
although i do not think it can replace adobe's photoshop, which i never liked in the first place, aperture is great with a broad range of format support.
it's almost possible to complete an entire wedding project without having to leave out of aperture, except to do additional enhancement work in photoshop or for laying out an album.
unlike photoshop lightroom, which i also tried, aperture makes it easy to do the photo management and improvement steps in any order that i choose.
i've gone from someone who only rarely edited photos due to the hassle of making duplicate copies, firing up photoshop, wasting extra hard drive space, etc.
photoshop would be the obvious choice for any type of advanced photo editing or graphics creation softwares.
this product, which unfortunately is pc only (not mac), has long been viewed as a very good substitute for photoshop because it is much less expensive than photoshop but is still powerful.
it is easier to use than adobe photoshop, but with many of the same useful features.
it's a shame paint shop pro (psp) is so often described as simply an alternative to photoshop.
to be honest adobe photoshop is the top pro paint/photo package to use because of the amount of extras and plugins that it can use but i find myself turning to paint shop pro very often.
if you are a photographer or a graphics designer, you better stick with photoshop,it is hard to learn but the quality is phenomenal.
i have had good luck with photoshop elements for several years and when adobe offered a product for video editing i was happy to get it.
i have to admit first off that i am a dedicated adobe fan, having used photoshop extensively over the last 7 years (along with illustrator.
i have to admit first off that i am a dedicated adobe fan, having used photoshop extensively over the last 7 years (along with illustrator).
note: in order to make dvd templates (dvd menus) for 3.0, you need photoshop elements 5.0 - earlier versions do not seem to work (or, at least, i can't get them to work properly).
after more than a year of frustration (crashes, bug patch after patch, poor technical support) with pinnacle, switched to premiere elements 3.0/ photoshop elements 5.
i don't give it 5 stars because i still think that (even though it's much cheaper than adobe photoshop) $300+ is a lot of money for software.
also there is a known fact that corel photo paint is the only serious competitor of adobe photoshop.
you don't have to pay the hefty ransom adobe demands for photoshop and illustrator because coreldraw can do most of the things that adobe does with far more flexible and easier-to-master interfaces.
since i have been in love with photoshop since 1998, i can't ever adjust to a new image editing program.
and i love using photoshop too.
now something that i found interesting is that the printer will print right out of photoshop or most any other application, because it is a printer.
it's not photoshop, but it's ten times more elaborate than microsoft paint.
soon i was photoshopping a text index onto the .jpgs i chose and printed them to the dvds with the discpainter.
for more complex text labeling jobs, i use photoshop and can literally utilize every font style available.
i use photoshop cs3 on mac and didn't bother to install the software that comes with the printer (i was impatient and didn't really want to burden my computer with yet another program).
for example, i often have photoshop, premier, and after effects running as well as adobe bridge.
my first thoughts were "what's wrong with my abode photoshop 7?
this is pretty nice - everything is basically the same as before for the things i use it for (photoshop).
if you ever feel creatively stagnant doing web work, switching from photoshop to fireworks really gets the juices flowing (if only by bringing a fresh pov in tools).
the eraser works on vector shapes the way the eraser in photoshop works on bitmapped shapes.
lots of hobbyists use either photoshop elements or the full photoshop application.
x3 includes coreldraw (competes with illustrator)adobe creative suite cs3 design premium upgrade [mac]adobe creative suite cs3 design premium upgrade and photopaint (competes with adobe photoshop).
however, it does recognize/import photoshop psd files and flash swf files, the latter being particularly useful for their (vector-based) high quality rendering and native background transparency.
don't use .tiff files either; if necessary convert them to jpeg in photoshop and bring in the jpeg's instead.
it's easy to move photoshop files (including their layers!) into the video stream.
particularly strong are the ability to move back and forth with audition (for sound editing), encore (for dvd creation), after effects (for adding special effects and animations), and photoshop (for
if you wanna learn digital video editing, adobe premiere pro is superpowerful has great effects integrates amazingly with photoshop and after affects and encore dvd.
i am still waiting after 3 weeks for a question about photoshop cs that shuts off after 20 minutes.
the features added in pro 1.5 make it a worthwhile upgrade: project management tools, panasonic 24p/24pa support, b zier keyframe controls, effects favorites (awesome), hidef (hdtv) support,
photoshop is great to paint with, but it is an all-around raster image creation program; painter is focused sharply on reproducing the sensual perceptions of painting.
many graphics software packages have these (adobe photoshop, macromedia fireworks) but these allow you to create web graphics with a handpainted or handdrawn look.
though the latest versions of photoshop sport an excellent brush tool and ample brush controls, there is nothing to match the power and possibilities of painter's brush creator.
the selection tools are nowhere near as good as what adobe supplies but it offers some options that photoshop doesn't have that are really useful for one who combines natural drawings with the
Compare Design and Multimedia Software for Photoshop »
Wize.com wants to improve! Will you please help by taking a quick survey?
No Thanks