the lack of this feature alone has sent me back to canon's fairly good digital photo professional oem software included with my cameras.
as a former photoshop user from back in the day (before cs), i was concerned i wouldn't have professional abilities with 4.0.
my finace is a professional photographer and is really able to do a lot with this program.
the studio 9 software that comes with it is awesome, full-featured enough for professional movies, it seems to me.
running windows xp professional with sp2 installed, as well as other software (i.e.
the program doesn't have the power and controls of adobe premiere, but premiere is aimed at professional videographers and lists at $699.
pinnacle manufactured great high end video boards for professional capture, overlay and editing...
i am a professional photographer, so i sprung for it right off, but i can say that i was not happy to have to pay for something that should have been given out free.
hope this helps someone else out there looking for a deal on the latest full professional version of adobe photoshop.
this is the best option if you are a professional photgrapher or a graphic designer.cons: difficult to learn you need to get training in order to understand this program.other thoughts: you have to
this type of sloppy coding, and absolutely appalling lack of customer service is what i would expect from some hacker kid coding from her basement -- not a professional organization like adobe.
this is truly a professional level digital photography post-processing package.
aperture does not interface with tools like dxo professional and provides no serious batch processing tools of its own.
as a professional photographer, i was thrilled when aperture came out.
granted, it's a complex product that does complex things, but i have a hard time believing anyone on the engineering team responsible for this heap has any professional photography or retouching
i am a professional wedding photographer/videographer.
when trying to insert photos into a document to create a professional looking brochure for publication i was very disappointed and was not able to use the software, which also kept closing down on me.
as a professional art director who has used both macs and pcs, i'm very familiar with the two major professional publishing programs, quarkxpress and adobe indesign (and also with framemaker and
i asked tech support about that and they said it can't be expected to provide the same features as professional software.
they were professional and courteous.
the rest of the collection is fun and just what i needed to complete my personal/professional projects.
as an example, out of over 90 leprechauns, there wasn't a single one of even a low level of professional quality.
the print shop 22 deluxethere are many programs available to non-professional designers.
i am not a professional graphic artist and do not work with desktop publishing or illustrations on a day-to-day basis.
on the front of the box it says it can be used for professional photo editing and has 20,000 professionally designed projects, when i received the box it had a disclaimer that the photos cannot be
Compare Design and Multimedia Software for Professional »
Wize.com wants to improve! Will you please help by taking a quick survey?
No Thanks