the main circuit is all in the left speaker, and outputs the signal to the right speaker via the included speaker wire.
i have these speakers hooked up to a dvd/cd player in a bedroom where they replaed a denon receiver and a pair of canadian bookshelf speakers that i just didn't have room for any more.
my prior setup was a pair of bic america bookshelf speakers hooked up to a receiver.
on the plus side, these speakers come with a media center remote whose receiver is in the right speaker, so it eliminates a bit of the clutter of having a separate usb infrared receiver, as the
it all depends on the recording.the highs are crystal clear.the uv remote works well until i interrupt the signal with my hand or head; then, everythng goes silent and has to be reset.
things i don't like over the bose/cons: *speakers are a little big compare to the bose *no dial or touch pad on speakers for volume (must use remote or software) *sub is bigger than the bose and
it doesn't seem to take much to block the signal, so it would have been great if it had been rf instead.
no problem with the reported "reset" problem after extended low signal intervals.
the computer room was loaded with kids playing x-box guitar hero and they did not interrupt the signal to the speakers.
my only complaint is that the transmitter which i have tucked away in one of the kitchen cabinets is not powerfull enough for the distance it needs to send the signal for me to keep the door to the
wireless signal: fair.
i had to do a bit of tweaking of the transmitter antenna and the receiver orientation to avoid occasional dropouts.
what's great about it:?comes with mounting bracket, excellent quality what's not so great:?none "i put these speakers on my dock and hooked them up to a receiver for when i'm swimming or lounging
my receiver doesn't have a dedicated ipod/mp3 input but that's doesn't matter because i have the dynex ipod docking station w/remote that comes with a/v cables (a must have!).
since this set does not have a subwoofer, setup is much simpler: one power connection, one signal connection to the computer and one more cable connecting the two speakers.
the only flaws i found with these speakers were a somewhat poor signal-to-noise ratio (sometimes had a noticeable hiss at moderate volume when no sound was playing or between songs), and that the
am using them to transmit the audio from our tv satellite receiver, but would be simple to move over to our stereo or computer.
to my pod cast of the jim rome show, i will get a very short interruption in sound but it is brief and rare - might have to do with the steam of the shower messing with the signal, not sure though.
also, i haven't used the speakers with batteries so i can't say anything about that but it does signal just fine through several walls.
you will need to purchase these http://www.connectworld.net/cgi-bin/dataw/l74234-06?mzms7pt6;;8 if you are going to connect them to a receiver that uses regular speaker connections.
i have the receiver located in my basement and the signal comes in loud and clear by my pool a good 100ft.
plus, it kept getting radio signals so you can always hear music in the background.
needed this to hook into my dvr receiver to get some stero sound for my mono tv.
i upgraded from a nice altec lansing 2.1 system (1 of the connecting wires for a speaker was no longer sending signal & since it was near the plug i could not fix) that had great midrange.
5.1 surround sound has nothing to do with whether the source outputs the signal in digital (optical/toslink or coax aka s/pdif) or analog to the amplification hardware (in this case, the sub which
long cords for the rear, decent sub, cheap remote with placeable receiver....it'll do.
upon opening the receiver/subwoofer i found capacitors and electrolyte paste everywhere.
cons: sub is not shielded.ir receiver is hard wired to the sub.
Compare Computer Speakers for Receiver »
Wize.com wants to improve! Will you please help by taking a quick survey?
No Thanks