a 2mm difference doesn't seem like much, but it is very nearly equivalent to the difference between 24mm and 28mm lenses on a 35mm-sized camera.
covering the most used and useful focal lengths from 16mm (24mm old style), which is probably as wide as you want to go in everyday shooting, through to 85mm (128mm old style), which is in the most
i purchased a nikon d200 in 2007 but held off buying a zoom lens to use as my-always-on-the-camera lens because there were no reasonable cost nikon zoom dr lens that covered 16 mm (equivlent of 24 mm
i'd been a fan of the old, ultra-versatile, 24-120mm nikkor for years, and i couldn't imagine buying a new d-slr without a lens of similar performance.
otherwise, if you want a superfast high quality all around glass for landscape and portrait, then get the nikon 24-70mm f/2.8(price tag around ~$1600 but it is worth every penny if you can afford it).
it's heavier than the canon, but compared to the canon 24-105mm i normally have attached, this is a feather.
the lens i use most on my nikon d300 is the fabled nikon 24-70mm f/2.8g ed af-s zoom, a fantastic general-purpose lens that works well in most situations including low-light environments.
the sharpness is clearly better than my 24-70 2.8l and my 70-200 2.8l is.
upgrades; but must weigh the cost as well as the conversion factor - - - or get a 50mm f/1.8 or better - or (17-55mm f/2.8 dx or 24-70mm f/2.8) instead [but also at a significant elevated cost].
i have a nikon d90 and my lenses are nikkor 16-85mm, 10-24mm, and a 60mm f/2.8d micro.
probably not wide enough for landmarks or buildings if you're travelling (in that case consider a 20mm or 24mm prime as a secondary lens; i already have a 24.)
sure - one can order the f/2 prime version [35mm] and potentially use that lens for future full format upgrades; but must weigh the cost as well as the conversion factor - - - or get a 50mm f/1.8 or
summary: in what has got to be both the smartest and stupidest decision i've ever made, i bought the 50mm f/1.2 l to complement my 24-105mm f/4 l lens.
i have a 24-70mm f/2.8l, 17-40mm f/4l, and 70-200mm f/2.8l is.
canon ef 24-70mm f/2.8l usm
yes, it does have noticeable barrel distortion at the wide end (which decreases significantly by around 24mm) and chromatic aberration (purple fringing, noticeable on tree branches and wires against
if you go to canon's website check out the lens diagram info, the guts of this lens is very, very, very close to the l 24-105mm.
Compare Camera Lenses for 24 »
Wize.com wants to improve! Will you please help by taking a quick survey?
No Thanks